Debilidad del proceso revolucionario
Por: Saúl Flores
Fecha de publicación: 07/03/10
This revolutionary process have many contradictions that can be dangerous, we must be consistent in our practice, I still insist that we can give no respite to the enemy, is crafty and has several strategies. Wear, nothing works, that there is no answer, are contradictions that spread quickly through the means emaciated. One drop after another drop makes a hole, they have many allies inside and outside the institutions. What does reform, transition and revolution? In many institutions have made only touch on top, without touching the structures of the Fourth Republic amalgamated to the vices of the corrupt. It continue to favor these groups can, for example in the field of research, scientists still elite campeante.
In recent years there is little that has been done, the eternal "excellencies" of the academies mock the efforts that the foundations of the revolutionary movement is trying to do for the science from the people. It is very difficult for academics, intellectuals, spend a moment to those who have never been able to have contact with science. In recent years, many young researchers who have become part of most research institutes, are counted on the fingers of the hand and fingers left over us, those who are committed to this revolutionary process, then what are we building? we may be forming a sort of old PDVSA that at one point openly confront the government. The institutions have not been able to break those old structures, and 10 years have passed and no major changes. We are doing just transition reforms, there is no revolution.
The state has had no clear picture as to what is science policy and science that we need in this revolutionary process, minister after minister each with a different approach. Who are the directors or officers of the general managers?, Are little known professionals, not political career. Understood needs to be changed if we are not playing the same can not be right with the above, the front and a little bit with the bottom. We must be consistent with our commitment to revolutionary changes have to be deep if it is not a revolutionary process, is just one reform, more of the same. What are your future plans and where is the inclusion of all sectors in the projects? so far little or nothing has been done, no interest for the above are still those who have power. Are they, who at the end decide which are the lines of research to develop. No consultation with the other, the collective, to which our president always gets to participate.
I know in recent years and what results they have resolved problems in our communities. And in squalid universities, which mostly have given them resources to projects and often spend years and do not deliver results, practically do that he wants with the money of all Venezuelans. It is up to the base, attract attention, stimulate discussion, debate into a true science to serve the people, to develop the true transformation and revolution in this field. Science is fundamental for the development of 21st century socialism. A different science, humanistic and balanced approach environmental sustainability, where research institutions are taken into account in all sectors in research projects, without excluding anyone. I wonder is this possible? ONLY POSSIBLE IN REVOLUTION.
In college there are many teachers attached to human misery, with no sacrifice. The universities should be centers of learning of knowledge are in the past, for this reason I believe it is necessary Alma Mater's mission, has a central axis with a commitment to raise awareness among new students. For example, the college of science should focus on doing science with a conscience, ethical, unselfish, with man, nature, society and environment in balance play an important role. The future of science in revolution, a physicist, for example, that it is only one particle, the atom as the center of ego, you should see that atom that surrounds our daily lives, they should not be considered only chemical that your life is result of a reaction that will produce a product or an item, you have to go beyond, to find solutions to the collective, not biologist or biologist, you should only think that life is centered on the origin of species sometimes racist, that the cells are key to life, that animals are a threat to their existence. The reality is that many children die of simple diarrhea. Over our heads has implemented a capitalist model, but there is a planet that is slowly consumed.
Consumerism traps us and inequality are mixed resulting in the poor clinging to the depths of the hills. You need a balance between man and nature if this happens, we say goodbye to our mother earth.
sflores@ivic.gob.ve
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment