Baking A Novelty Cake

Press Office Minister J. Chacón, EMERGENCY Emergency Declared

Free Prom Dress Catalogs 2011

LABOR Labor in the Explanatory

How Many Hole In Woman

MPPCTII Director IVIC researchers concerning retirees. Fascism in Sartenejas

By: Press IVIC
prensa@ivic.ve

The Director of the Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC), Dr. Angel Viloria, clarifies to the public that there will be no collapse of the institution by regularizing the situation of 27 researchers retirees under the scheme called Stay at Work Research (PLI).

Today the Board of IVIC reviewing this program, which was created in 1992 by an internal resolution of the Institute. "Some researchers are about to turn 20 years having acquired the right to retirement and remain the beneficiaries of PLI within the institution since 1992, ie 17 years are enjoying a profit, which contradicts the spirit of the pension and legal drawbacks, "said Viloria.

IVIC The Board decided to revise the figure to the bottom and it is likely that this particular regime is gone, so IVIC authorities are seeking an alternative way for researchers to retirees who are "motivated to continue working the good of the country, making relief generation and carrying out research of high national relevance, can do and enjoy conditions minimum within the institution. "

According to the standard established researchers under this scheme must meet the work schedule and adhere to the duty of all workers in the IVIC. But being retired, are exempt from income tax cancel and should not make statements of their assets. They also receive an annual bonus of two months (vacation bonus equivalent to active researchers), are other bonds that are not canceled IVIC staff and retired staff, unlike active-they do not apply to them the respective deductions biweekly payroll.

other hand, maintain their personal and work teams under his supervision, unable to resume teaching in and out of IVIC IVIC, which also can retire these universities receive annual budget for research (equipment, vi attics, books, travel and other supplies, as active researchers) and can receive foreign funding, among other benefits.

It was learned that there are four cases of application for renewal of the PLI scheme that had to defer, until the Board of Directors of IVIC a decision on the scheme permanent. "You have to check those who have been benefiting from institutional budgets without personal career almost 20 years to see a return on investment made by the IVIC. Some Venezuelan newspapers have offered a distorted impression of this problem, "he said. Viloria.

media distortion

There are 27 retirees covered by the IVIC Special Stay in research, and the prospect of the elimination of the program some print and broadcast media have asserted that the Institute will collapse, because there are people ready to supplant them. "This gives a poor impression about the capabilities of these people expected that the research need to train a generation of relief, and a terrible idea to egomania among these scientists, "said Director of IVIC.

IVIC currently has about 190 researchers and postdoctoral fellows. In the opinion of the Director, maintain and support all research that would be useful and necessary to the country. "We can not continue to invest primarily in matters that are of interest to the state," he said.

addition to this, according to Viloria has become a public scandal for the withdrawal of the benefit of a retired PLI. It was learned he did not meet the minimum duty Requirements: attend the lab, as confirmed in the IVIC. This retired for 12 years benefited from the PLI and a series of labor and budget prerogatives to work, to travel to scientific meetings and academic stays abroad, purchase instruments and equipment for a laboratory of the State.

"IVIC authorities were outraged: this is not a dismissal, the man is retired from the first of July 1997. He spent the entire budget, and did not attend. We do not know if all those scientific articles that made claims to have published elsewhere. The authorities of the Institute can not be complicit of immorality. We are tired of academic rhetoric and hypocrisy, "said Viloria.

IVIC Director stressed that it was a purely administrative matter, but some journalists have given a political tinge, attacking the national institutions, he said. "In the IVIC and will continue to follow state policies. At no time did the authorities of the Institute (which are also research scientists) have attempted to judge the quality of research by retired favored by the PLI. What is certain is that the parameters that had been measured the scientific productivity and that is building the prestige of the scientists are mostly unrelated to the fundamental values \u200b\u200bof contemporary Venezuela. It is not possible to give prominence to the citation indexes created by commercial consortia. We must assess how much sense does it continue to count publications and awards to the country's future. "

not only reviews the PLI. IVIC currently being revised in the organizational aspects, structural and functional. It was learned that this will lead to the establishment of a new legal framework, according to the Bolivarian philosophy that ensures that the Institute was primarily to meet basic needs country and not to favor elites and minority groups, nor remain a springboard to catapult careers, Viloria said.

can not lose sight of the IVIC is a state institution under the Ministry of Popular Power for Science, Technology and Industry Middle, and it should work in line with government policies, he said.

About Hernia In Babies

!!!!!

advocates warn workers of the Revolution !!!!!

created first individual employer-employee contract castrating social control, social intelligence, situational.

Kate's Playground New Vid

Scientists and the Bolivarian Revolution

Scientists and Revolution Bolivarian

By: Saul Flores and Juan Vargas

"All these institutions have to be oriented ... It's not science to please, that we urge and institutions that are financed with the people, Hagan science useful for Venezuela, these institutions must be transformed according to the needs of the country, leaving their encapsulation, make useful science, social research, science and technology to raise the standard of living of the people, out of these laboratories and the laboratory will have to be social ... the social laboratory .... to go with his other hand escualidismo for socialism or death ... science and technology to serve the people not the elite or personal whims, caprices of complacency "

On March 9, at No. 329 Alo Presidente, President Hugo Chávez made this statement referring to the Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas - IVIC. After these statements was no response from some scientists who felt alluded to this claim. They claimed persecution, lack of financial support, establishing a dictatorship in the scientific, arguments that disagree and dispute the claim. Far from wanting to give personal responses to these assertions of those "offended" by President Chávez prefer attempt to analyze these elements together within the Venezuelan social context and respond as "scientists" who we are.

The first thing to say is that science and knowledge are forms of domination, ie science is power. If any doubt, just look at that vast country have pre-economic and political dominance worldwide, the answer is pretty clear: those who have developed the necessary technology and knowledge to subordinate those who have been prevented. So we have to distinguish that in science -Like in politics or the economy-there own terms of what should occur and how they will spread the benefits of that production. Remember how, until recently, only the privileged Venezuelans came to the university and the richest country out of the centers of research. Once trained these people in the scientific field and after the assimilation of foreign culture where they had formed, returning to Venezuela to play the production model learned and implemented the domain structure from the North or Europe. Over time, conditions and research domain or country lines ended promoter imposed. Very few have taken the step of reinterpreting the knowledge gained in the "developed" for the benefit of that knowledge are in their own society. On the contrary, as stated by Ludovico Silva, the dependence of underdevelopment, which also involves the dissemination of our science and its own development is subjected to the will of developed countries like the United States, leaving them with the benefits and Worse, with the secret of these technologies, which makes us users and consumers of science and technology whose inner workings are unknown to us. It is these conditions that we have to reveal and understand our scientific alienation, which manifests itself in the inability of scientists to integrate their knowledge to the realities and needs of their society.

The problem under discussion is not to decrease the budget, he who denies the fact that the Bolivarian government has allocated the largest budget the last decades (about 2.5% of gross domestic product devoted to development of science and technology, the highest in Latin America, surpassed only by the Nordic countries, Japan and Korea investing something like 3.5%), or be a blind or a liar. The problem as we understand it is that has changed the North-South relationship, which means that it now accepts more than the North scientific imperialism is not the dream to solve problems, rather it is the nightmare that still dream. The fact is that knowledge has diversified and has attempted to broaden its distribution, through agreements with other countries, with the opening of new universities, which for lack of participation of scientists and the inability red tape does not have been able to develop new lines of strategic research for Venezuela. We do not understand how a scientist can say that Venezuela does not need as many universities, because many professionals are not required. This statement only reveals their level of alienation or complicity, since it is clear that scientific and technological backwardness generates economic and political dependence. To open a flower and let it rain a thousand schools, said Mao Tse Tung, a thousand schools, a thousand universities, but with heart humanist, socialist, Latin American and emancipator, not heart corrupt, capitalist alienation.

we say that President Chavez, like any human being is wrong. Such is the case when he says that our scientists do science indulgent, capricious, if that were the case there would be no problem, because that science would be directed only to the aggrandizement of a few egos. The real problem is that our scientists do science capitalist and many ignore it, but many others do not want to admit it, so they hide behind their habit of objectivity, wisdom and incorruptibility. It alienated the scientist, who does not realize that outside of the laboratory, test tubes, computers and test tubes, as Chavez said, there is a social laboratory that is much more important because it is in that place where lies the object Science: human beings. These academics are clearly opposed to the government led by President Chavez, closely resemble those groups of intellectuals who criticized Marx and Engels in almost all his works, and intellectuals Gramsci described as "traditional , which are regarded as independent social life and consequently put their ideas serving class interests, becoming a "nuisance marginal" because they belong to a time before and is in danger of being overtaken. Such intellectuals have no problem endorsing the outrageous invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, Communion Israeli fascist with annihilation against the Lebanese or the Palestinians, to support the embargo against Cuba, or to say that they are persecuted or not they are supported, in short, to lie to the people selectively to protect and legitimize their own interests and of those they serve or with whom they identify. These groups of scientists are frequently appearing in the programs of the private media, at conferences, supporting and participating in campaigns to discredit the revolutionary process. His action has a moral and ethical background, although it will convince many people based on deception, we can not do the same with his conscience. It is this class of intellectuals who protect a number of privileges in its narrow understanding of objective reality, perceived rights. It is they who defend hierarchies, ranks, vying among themselves to highlight and outshine their opponents, they who seek to shine like stars in the intellectual firmament, trivializing and commercializing its own practice, their profession, their work. It is they who alienated not understand the relationship between science and human being, science and society, science and nature. They are the ones who do not understand that their knowledge should not be employed by their own egos, but the needs of society. Complacency arises after realizing that they can never come to occupy the pedestal reserved for those scientists from the centers of power, so must play their little pyramid of prestige, which occupy the privileged position and to defend at all costs, so the behavior that is self-indulgent is part of the capitalist system of scientific production. But for its imitation of servers required structure to work, slaves, data producers, no questions , followers and supporters. The latter will be selected from universities few other characters as they control, it plays the circle of complacency and complicity. These "chosen" can only have red blood, because in his mind must be absent this color, must be willing to climb the pyramid and compete with each other, because as good scientists think, it is only possible survival of the fittest, the strongest, the more flattering. Ideologizing ideological and scientific. Reproduces the ideological system that alienates, ideologizing because they are the new generation of scientists in the same vices, in the same mental entelechies. It is evident a contradiction: the science is the paradigm of change and transformation, is to embody the paradigm of backwardness and the static, tradition. Thing to say, it is paradoxical to note, as in a socialist state in scientific research institutions, as IVIC maintain structures that play a caste system and gods, a feudal, colonial.

The other class of intellectuals, identified by Gramsci, intellectuals are "organic ." They are the product of an emerging social class and are called to become a true self homogeneous political, economic and cultural. In this category are contained scientists, philosophers, ideologues, activists, politicians, industrial technicians, lawyers, economists, etc. They more than being "contemplative and legitimizing intellectual " become agents of change through its participatory action in social life and in those areas where the theoretical articulation of various political currents is necessary. Gramsci states that the activity of the organic intellectuals must be understood as a cultural battle to transform the popular mind and disseminate scientific innovations, philosophical (thinking) that prove to be historically true as long as specifically become universal in a particular social context and historical (for our If the context is Venezuelan and Latin American). Consequently, the organic intellectual does not accept the current consciousness of the masses, nor is it intended to convey any kind of higher truth. Simply acts as a bridge between "scientific knowledge " and "common sense " self in people, to enable a better understanding of social reality that are part and thus to different collective social practices that generate the transform. In short the work of these scientists is designed to help socially excluded sectors understand the reasons for its holding, their misery, so that, are able to generate practical change that reality. In this group are a large number of intellectuals and scientists Venezuelans who work among indigenous communities, black peasants, workers, marginal and that through hard work trying to transform and provide options (even limited ) to these people among whom they work and which are not only under investigation, but partners and active subjects capable of generating change. It is they who have understood something that the people had understood long ago: the need to integrate the ancient knowledge, popular, scientific practice, because only the "dialogue of knowledge" and "knowledge transfer" with and for communities that will replace the old capitalist paradigm and indeed the emergence of a scientific revolution, moral and cultural development of human and social order. Building a social science is possible as long as scientists and intellectuals to understand and identify, as does President Chavez, I l excluded social sectors that they recognize the wisdom of the most humble of the land, of which only read, for those who have never set foot in a college, but have filled his life with love for their land, this country why we work every day. Also when the work of all scientists, without exception, regardless of rank or hierarchy, is dignified moral and material, when it recognizes the personal and creative researcher.

The "organic intellectuals and scientists " require special attention by the Bolivarian Revolutionary process and that the changes should not only be economic level but also at the level of culture, ideology, the latter being perhaps the most critical, since any model that offers an alternative to capitalism is a "different world " a much different way of relating between people and nature. It is true that many of these scientists are not interested in positions of prestige or power, for a long time know that his lab is in the communities and their efforts are aimed at finding solutions and alternatives to the problems and needs that these have. Others, while certainly could play good administrative and managerial functions, are not and most likely has not given the opportunity and confidence to do so, because this would subvert the natural order of the gods, so they are doomed to excluded from the decision and execution levels of government, because they have never been to Europe or the United States to certify their knowledge of the colonizer [1] . It is a sad but harsh reality that arises as a result of the contradiction between rhetoric and practice of those who have been charged in the institutions to carry out processes of transformation, as these people tend to protect what they should change, simply because they belong to the old structure that is wounded but not killed. For science becomes necessary to change the relationships and system scientific production, while prevailing capitalist and colonial structure, it is not possible the birth of new human and social sciences.

transformations we have spoken must be deep and should be directed to expose a reality that has been built according to the interests of a few, whether they be imperialist elites, local elites or simply operators. What is at stake is our future as a species, the possibility of a world in which the differences are not used to justify exclusion, death, but rather are interpreted as the possibility of coexistence future multi-worthy. The "scientific organic" have this great responsibility and must be champions of this cause. We support President Chavez because we recognize their effort to transform and revolutionize our society, to build a more dignified and inclusive reality for those who have only been pieces on the chess capitalists. We also recognize that the flaws and criticize. We assume our political stance, we do not hide behind the impartiality or scientific nature as do those that oppose the revolutionary process, we customize our discussion not because we believe it is in the process and not the people we should focus our discussion. The debate is raised hope to hear many more voices.

---

[1] [1] currently evaluating whether a researcher produces quality work, they have to be measured by publication rates of the first world (Science Citation Index). Otherwise the work done by an investigator has no value for institutional advancement. It is well known that our problems can differ and do differ from first-world problems, so those who make a science of interest to the first world, certainly not produce something for our immediate national interest and that they will become branches of science colonial colonialism, if you want be accepted in its institutional environment and national levels. He reveals a new contradiction.

Pokemon Sapphire Walkthrough For Gpsphone

A science for the people? Fourth Generation War

A science for the people?:

Comments about the science of relevance and social belonging.

Currently, the production process of science is characterized by high specialization and hierarchy. The fragmentation of scientific knowledge involves a particular form of organization of the production relations of science. There are a number of specialists working in laboratories also are specialized, which generate basic knowledge and applied research on specific problems. A biologist is not engaged in studying, for example, processes and mechanisms of mutation of all genes, but of a particular gene. A physicist does not study all the phenomena of thermodynamics but one in particular, and so on. The high level of hierarchy and specialization of science fragmented world, which the scientist is unable to integrate their knowledge and practice their individual life experience, social and collective. The fragmentation of knowledge has led to a production system alienating, in which the science is not valued for what it is but by the amount of data it produces.

Another feature of the system of scientific production is existence of relations of domination between the great hegemonic centers of science and research centers in Latin America. Remember how, until recently, only privileged Venezuelans came to the university and the richest out of the country to complete their training in many of these centers. Once trained these people in the scientific field and after the assimilation of foreign culture in which they had formed, returning to Venezuela to play the production model learned and implemented the domain structure from the North or Europe. Over time, conditions and research domain or country lines ended imposed promoter. Very few have taken the step of reinterpreting the knowledge gained in the "developed" countries, so that the benefits of this knowledge are in their own society. Therefore, when reproducing the conditions of domination, scientific activity is ideological because despite declaring a neutral, use of science or let others use it to preserve or enhance the order of capitalist exploitation. Faced with this painful situation, the social scientist must oppose a science in its knowledge and practice, in the service of people, that is, a science with social commitment that allows to reveal the relations of exploitation in which live their congeners, a science that, to help remove the shroud of mystery with other scientists and ideologues have distorted the objective reality of the capitalist system. The social scientist is opposed to the irrational use of the invention, because his conscience allows him to understand that the ultimate goal and the main reason for its practice, is the benefit of its own species without the expense of the others. The scientist is by definition socialist humanist and environmentalist.

should also be considered that much of the research done in Latin America, is funded by foreign associations, such as multinational energy, pharmaceutical, and telecommunications sector, etc. This "aid" implies that much of the knowledge produced in our countries, ending in the hands of these companies, so that beneficiaries are not our people but the huge transnational. In that sense we must distinguish the fact that the ruling class called themselves the "first world", has long adopted a commitment to science, which is based on the idea that if the science is good long term for capitalism then, what is good for capitalism "first world" is good for humanity. This commitment involves an expansion of the scientific system to our Western capitalist countries, under the slogan of development and progress for at least 500 years we have been enslaved. In this regard Venezuela taken a big step in the last ten years under the government of President Chavez, seeking scientific and technological sovereignty through the enactment of laws like the LOCTI, providing financial resources for scientific research, however this situation, many "scientists capitalists" denounce the alleged lack of support for the Bolivarian government. Venezuela is now one of the countries offering the best conditions to do science, do not tell us, tell our colleagues in other Latin American countries who really do not have the support of their governments, governments have indeed made the scientist a beggar.

Despite these important advances, today much of the results of research in basic science, is still appropriate for private companies and corporations, which develop application forms which subsequently us back in the form of product-ware. Remember that this is one of the conditions of colonialism and imperialism, buy cheap raw materials and sell them to the colonies finished products very expensive. This applies to medicines and vaccines, since not having a pharmaceutical industry itself (which should be one of the strategic tasks of the Bolivarian Revolutionary Government), there is possibility that in our country these products are produced. For many drugs, active agents from species of plants native to our region, plants that have been used by indigenous communities for hundreds and thousands of years, but to be studied and synthesized in laboratories and subsequently sold, become the property of the pharmaceutical industry. The same occurs in the field of biotechnology. For example, production of agriculture "modern" is nothing that the use of molecular biology techniques to produce a variety of "transgenic plants", has replaced traditional agriculture to a level that now occupies 90 % of agricultural production worldwide. Such is the case of cereals such as maize and GM soy, which are held by 2 or 3 multinationals that manage much of the seed germplasm for agriculture. Many of these seeds originally came from our countries, but paradoxically have gone to transnational monopolies that dominate the world market, such as Monsanto, NORVATIS, MICOGEN. Con una gran inversión en propaganda ideológica, estos monopolios han hecho creer al mundo que con el uso de estas tecnologías, van a acabar con el hambre y la miseria. La contracara de esta moneda nos indica que esto no es así. Esta tecnología es demasiado costosa por lo que los países más pobres no pueden adquirirla, quedando excluidos de este tipo de mercado y condenados a la hambruna. Así que, con la aplicación de la ciencia biogenética se reproducen las condiciones de explotación del ser humano y la desigualad en la distribución de los beneficios de la investigación científica, causado por la desigualdad en el acceso a las tecnologías, ya que el interés de estas empresas is playing its gain, increase the accumulation of capital and not the benefit of people. We should also mention that within this great business to these transnational capitalists do not care about the consequences that consumption of these foods may have on human health, nor care about the environmental impact that may cause the use of this technology. Here is an example of using science to make the balance to tilt toward the more powerful side.

Many of our scientists know that this happens but keep silent, some just a product of their alienation and many others share in the profits of mercantilism in science. An ethical question arises here. Just wondering how to make our research is for the people? A first step is to report the misuse of knowledge we produce, exploitation and domination through it is built upon our people. It is difficult for scientists to take this position because doing so would be betraying their own kind and their own interests.

Now, as the system of consumption of scientific knowledge, we must say that it is also highly localized. The results of scientific research are only disseminated to specialists through publications, conferences, seminars, forums and more. The relevance and importance of research is measured by the impact factors assigned to various publications, these indices are defined by the same scientists and the highest scores are the North American and European publications (Science, Nature, etc. .) Although post there is no guarantee of quality, for these same publications recognize that material published by them have resorted to plagiarism and falsification of data, our impact assessment schemes give priority to participation in these magazines. We have nothing against these publications as we see them as a means by which scientists can test their models and hypotheses through discussion and critique with other national and foreign colleagues. As we disagree, is that publishing in these journals is what defines the impact of research and in many cases constitutes the basis of science. So we wonder if anything would not it be more relevant to measure the impact of an investigation by the impact it has on people? How could this be? These are questions we must begin to respond. While we understand that most of the volume of publications are in English, because as they say colleagues this is the language of science, who is to say that this should remain so? In that case it would be worth thinking about the issue of regional publications, such as between the ALBA countries or between countries that are working on similar research lines. These new publications should ensure the quality of the articles and also the participation of colleagues who wish to publish in languages \u200b\u200bother than English. Doing so would be taking a big step in the decolonization of knowledge. We believe not only in the quality of our scientists, but also the greatness of our culture. It is a pity to see so many colleagues who deny and defame to their own countries, and blinded by the "American dream" only aspire to be imitation of the decadent culture of the planet. Another problem related to the distribution of knowledge has to do with the limited (if not null) scientific publication aimed at public "unskilled", ie the people. The few publications that there are no more than manuals and leaflets including scientific research only addressed superficially, this happens because many people do not understand, but is contradictory to propose this for how you will understand if you explain? Therefore departments and scientific press release should be dedicated to disclose what scientists do, so that communities can access a knowledge so far has been denied. is not fair that "the benefit of what we do get to their rightful owners, ie those who through their taxes and fund scientific research work in Venezuela?

Also need to think about who has access to scientific knowledge, ie how it is distributed. As mentioned in the article "Scientists and the Bolivarian Revolution," most people who do science from a small circle of complacency and complicity. For a person to investigate a particular problem will have to acquire the necessary knowledge to do so. This knowledge will be transmitted by those "scholars" who know the "secrets" of this area of \u200b\u200bscience in particular, allowing a hierarchy exists between the "expert" and "started." Individual private ownership of specific knowledge, then allowed into the process of emerging scientific production of power and dominance relations, ie relations of production into the space of politics.

Another feature is that scientific knowledge is surrounded by an aura of mystery that makes for most "mere mortals" is inaccessible. Rather than being science is that many of our institutions today is done is scientism, ie science and religion. To be launched in scientific knowledge, the disciple must after a series of tests that validate their vocation, linked to one of the "clerical caste" in which science is taught in all the secrets of science. The first thing to learn is the language of their respective caste, as The methods to perform the rite of science. This language and method will be banned for "mere mortals" and is practiced in the private circle of his caste. The white coats of science and scientific activity does not represent, however, those white coats really represent what is the dress of the priests of the new religion scientism. Atoms, genes, bacteria, viruses, mechanisms, vectors, forces, protocols, instruments, microscopy, redistribution mechanisms, transculturation, many of the sacred words using the "enlightened." The "believers" on the other hand, observe and abide by the designs of los sabios, pues son ellos los que tienen el conocimiento, la razón. Los “creyentes” ven en la ciencia el camino al paraíso, la solución a los problemas terrenales como el hambre, las enfermedades, el analfabetismo, la miseria, la guerra y la muerte. Los grandes “obispos” desde sus “catedrales cientificistas”, deciden la jerarquía eclesiástica, dictan los grandes nuevos designios, las verdades absolutas. Los creyentes están excluidos del ámbito sagrado: En un sistema académico como el que aún existe en Venezuela, la elección de un candidato a científico se da sobre la base de sus aptitudes intelectuales y académicas. Pero, si bien es cierto que en un inicio every human being is endowed with the same skills, the social context creates differences. Is not the same study with an empty stomach, with a full stomach. However, this condition is not conclusive as there are who, despite all these difficulties have been following the path of science, as is our case. The issue here is the principle of segregation present in the distribution system of scientific knowledge, which makes scientific practice is a matter of elites, who know nothing about the needs of his people, because only he who has endured hunger and poverty can talk about it. We make this radical statement, because for many of those who speak of defending the interests of the "weaker" and to "science for the people, poverty is just a curiosity, something only seen each morning through the windows of their cars, at kilometer three of the Pan American Highway, where turn to their laboratories at the IVIC and can choose to see or not see. The poor, the poor only have their poverty and can not avoid her.

then it is worth asking if "we do scientists really Venezuela SCIENCE FOR THE PEOPLE? The answer is left to their own opinion. We want to go a step further and ask, "HOW TO MAKE A SCIENCE FOR THE PEOPLE?

L to science and knowledge are forms of domination, that is science is power. If any doubt, just by looking which vast countries have economic and political dominance worldwide, the answer is pretty clear: those who have developed the necessary technology and knowledge to subordinate those who have been prevented. This indicates that our age is impossible to escape the political consequences that have to do science. In the crossroads that led us capitalism and scientism of capitalism (ie science as a new religion), it requires more than a simple reform, we need a revolution in science, a strategy of opposition to those who defend the capitalist model of science.

Social scientists must find ways to make their knowledge come to communities so they can make use of it. New forms of social practice of science in which knowledge will strengthen the capacity of the struggle of the oppressed and exploited, attention which reveal the degree of alienation and exploitation in which they are, so that in this way, they can take their own process of transformation. One strategy that can be implemented is that all discoveries or new techniques are freely available, both materially and financially, which would reduce their use for commercial gain by individuals or private institutions. We can also connect communities in the production of basic science through strategies to transfer the scientific knowledge we produce, so that they take ownership and make use of it. In fact, it is something that long has been done by scientific medicine, which has consistently appropriate knowledge of medicine ancestral indigenous communities, but to date has been recognition of this fact. Another action that can be taken to advance the construction of a science for the people, is the demystification of scientific endeavor, for which a large part of the work must be done within the scientific community. Researchers must expose and oppose the technocratic and elitist attitudes which are permeated our institutions (IVIC, for example). Have to overcome the fragmentation of knowledge, leading to the reproduction of "experts" unable to connect their work to the needs of their society, for this multidisciplinary work is essential and we believe, much more stimulating than one that offers a microcosm of their expertise.

The doctrine that the problems of technological nature but can not be solved through technological solutions, is an ideology that the ruling class uses to legitimize its power. As mentioned above, with the idea of \u200b\u200btechnological development have historically enslaved our people. What good is technology that does not serve the people?, What good is technology if it is used to exploit human beings? So that before a technological revolution, there must be a cultural revolution of conscience, as stated by President Chavez. It is for this reason that there is a need to "implement a socialist science policy intention is that both EU and non-authoritarian" as stated Manuel Sacristán, allowing a radical political transformation (revolution) into the production process scientific, and go beyond a simple "technological revolution." Including the people in theory and practice of science is the way, that in this way we can transform the relations of production and adapt its production to these new relationships. The creation of committees on science and technology community councils should be a priority addressed in the first instance to identify the needs of communities in this area in order to ask from science strategies that respond to them. must promote a discussion of these issues in both directions, from top to bottom and vice versa, through the establishment of working groups in which different actors are present and where equality prevails, where there may be a broad dialogue and respectful to undertake all the way to solve the problems we are faced with the use of scientific knowledge, based on a multidisciplinary and social spectrum. Here are some ideas that we discuss not only those who do science, they must also speak for those who do science: the people.

hope to further expand and contribute to this discussion. To conclude we want to reproduce a fragment of Eduardo Rothe:

"Science in the service of capital, of goods and entertainment, is not simply the capitalized knowledge, fetishism of the idea and method, alienated image of human thought. Seudograndeza of men, their passive knowledge of a mediocre reality is the justification magic of a race of slaves. "

The debate is brought forward to hearing many more voices.

Saul Flores Juan Vargas

When Can I Buy A Piece Of Foam

G4G (technobureaucracy)

G4G

Five weeks it reached the pupil FII Nuris Orihuela and Gladys Maggi, invites all FII to present the proposal general changes, where for the first film can be glimpsed the inclusion of a number of advisors in the first half hour of the presentation is devoted to indicate that the FII is not organized, has no procedures is disconnected from reality, is outlawed in the administrative, etc., proposed an organization pointing clearly to add players to articulate the governance numerically management in the IFI, naturally invites all to the participation and collaboration and consensus in all these actions. It should be noted that these presentations where and explanations addressed to holders working in the collective psyche of making him see that engineering school is in a state of legal and administrative weakness, emphasizing the absence of administrative and technical procedures. Was seen in the second session to all heads of institution, unit heads and project the presence of a group of guests who are now part of the advisory body hired by the pupil to implement the changes.

We may also note how the strategy applies G4G FII, to be collecting and using propaganda to discourage and undermine articulated culture management technique in the FII taken from the positions of more institution influence as were meetings with directors gradual, middle managers, unit heads, project leaders and workers in general . So, in every individuality is built information in the fii nothing works and then have to accept every initiative that comes from the author of the structured message and directed. Additionally, in the minds is the residual task blame, a task which certainly contributes to the internal division and judgments a priori among the group, balancing behaviors that promote the purposes of the author of the message structure.

course in a G4G shares in FII, it is known that men and women workers are not able to perform actions of self-analysis and to generate proposals in less time than that the plaintiff can do on especially if the plaintiff has weapons and resources that the group does not, be understood as weapons the money to buy and build understood and advisory documents articulated to an end, promoted as experts in various fields, by the time administrative matters because the technical stuff (which is our strength) is not subject of this first phase of reforms, because there are strengths in the author's structured message to influence the nature of the institution permanently.

society or community of mostly FII technique is the real disposition to leave their work and daily technical task to generate in a shorter time than the plaintiff answers by proposals arising from social intelligence situational IFI restructuring actions across vertical field within the FII. If anything could emerge a proposed order that another individual, that does not have a broad consensus not succeed to the author's proposed reform (divide and conquer).

loquacious Shares aware of the latest strategies to ensure domestic control structures of the institutions (IFI), ministries and other components of a State, in seeking to prevent that get out of the trenches through their speeches, arguments and actions directed to your work and working think only about today and now, and let your future tomorrow and other people paid for that you do not think of your own destiny.

ready to think, if it is not yet besieged your mind to behave like a group of workers from the old Civil Service National where the common interest is the individual, and collective public is ethereal, where everything is everybody and nobody , meaning that the semantic confusion operate in your psyche and resolve not to understand what is so inviting you contradictory and difficult to sort and assimilate. HS

Avoid Scratching Induction Cooktop

Psychological Warfare (or War Without Guns)

The current conceptual definition, the backbone of the Fourth Generation Warfare is part of the concept of "psychological war" , or "war without guns" was coined for the first time in the manual of military strategy in the seventies.

In its technical definition, "Psychological Warfare" or "War Without Guns" is the planned use of propaganda and psychological warfare designed to address behavior in the pursuit of objectives of social control political or military, without resorting to the use of weapons.

military armies, are replaced by decentralized task forces and counter-insurgency specialists, and experts in communication and mass psychology.

development and computer technology era of communications, the globalization of the message and the capacity to influence world public opinion, become the media psychological warfare operations in the key strategic weapon of 4GW.

As in military warfare, psychological warfare plan is intended to: kill, control or absorb the enemy.

War military and their techniques are revalued within the scientific methods of social control, and become an efficient strategy domain without the use of arms.

Unlike conventional war, Fourth Generation war does not develop into visible theaters. There

battlefronts with material elements: the war develops in stages combined, with no apparent order and with no visible lines of combat, the new soldiers do not wear uniforms and blend in with civilians.

Gone are the elements of classical military action: major combat units (tanks, planes, soldiers, fronts, communication lines, rear, etc).
planning
military bases are replaced by small command centers and clandestine planning, from where it designs modern tactical and strategic operations.

The big battles are replaced by small localized conflicts with extreme social violence, and in no apparent order of continuity.

Large military forces are replaced by small task forces (psychological warfare units) equipped with high mobility and cutting edge technology, whose function is to trigger social and political outcomes through psychological warfare operations.

Psychological Warfare units are supplemented by Task Forces infiltrated the civilian population with the mission to detonate violence and social conflict.

tactics and military strategies are replaced by tactics and strategies of social control through the manipulation of information and psychological operations aimed at addressing mass social behavior.

Whites are not physical (as in the traditional military order), but psychological and social. The purpose and not aimed at the destruction of essential services (military bases, soldiers, civil infrastructure, etc.), but the human brain to control

Large military units (ships, planes, tanks, submarines, etc) are replaced by a huge media apparatus composed of the great editors and radio and television studios.

The bombardment is replaced by the media blitz: The slogans and images replace the bombs, missiles and bullets of the military field.
The strategic objective is no longer the seizure and control of natural areas (populations, territory, et) but the seizure and control of mass social behavior.

tactical combat units (operators of psychological warfare) and do not fire bullets but routed slogans sought on control and manipulation of mass social behavior.

tanks, rifles and planes are replaced by the media (the armies of the fourth generation) and psychological operations constitute the key operational and strategic weapon.

White
The War Without Guns, Fourth Generation War (also called asymmetric warfare), the battlefield is no longer on the outside, but inside his head.

operations are no longer drawn from the military colonization to control a territory, but from the mental colonization to control a society.

4GW Soldiers are not military but communication experts insurgency and counterinsurgency, which replaced the military operations psychological operations.

military bullets are replaced by media slogans that do not destroy your body, but override their brain power to decide for yourself.

media with slogans bombings intended to destroy the reflective thinking (information processing and synthesis) and replace it with a succession of images without resolution of time and space (controlled alienation).

Bombing media do not operate on their intelligence, but on their psychology: do not manipulate their conscience but their unconscious desires and fears.

Every day, 24 hours, there is an invisible army, pointing to his head: do not use tanks, planes and submarines, but directed and manipulated information through images and headlines.

psychological warriors do not want you to think about information, but you consume information, news, headlines, images that excite your senses and curiosity, unconnected.

Your brain is subject to the logic of Machiavelli: "divide and rule": When your mind is fragmented with headlines unconnected leaves to analyze (what, why and wherefore of each piece of information) and consumer becomes directional psychological orders through slogans.

holders and images are the next generation missiles that the big media chains fire with devastating accuracy on your brain become theater of the Fourth Generation Warfare

When you consume headlines "Bin Laden" " Al Qaeda "," Islamic terrorism ": the mind is using slogans of fear associated with" terrorism ", and your brain is serving as a theater of operations to" Counter-Terrorism War "launched to control the global corporations. When you eat

international press without analyzing how and why, the interests of imperial power moving behind each story or news reporting, you're consuming Fourth Generation War.